Blog – World Opinion
CLAIMS OF SOVEREIGNTY ON MARITIME
DISPUTES IN SOUTH CHINA SEA FORESEEN AMICABLE SETTLEMENT BETWEEN CLAIMANTS.
GENERAL SANTOS CITY – November 8,
2015 – In recent United Nations International Court of Justice news releases on
Thursday and called the Chinese government “an active advocator for peaceful
settlement of disputes” is a signed of all parties claimants on maritime claims
would have positive notes for a peaceful settlement once and for all.
Chinese
government has declared that it will not take part in arbitration case with the
Philippines against China filed in the International Court of Justice. It is
simple and a wise moved by the Chinese government that they will not have an
international supports, if just in case, they will not favor the ruling of ICJ
for their interest. In the long run they will sanctions by the International
Community if they lost in the arbitration case filed by the Philippine
government. This wills 100% affected their economy and
domestic affairs.
China moves keep on insisting on
one-on-one negotiation’s will smaller rival claimants which analysts expert say
would give Beiging the advantage because of its sheer size and clout to deal
with.
With the recent statement by Xu
Hong, Director for General of the Foreign Ministry’s Department of Treaty and
Law told a UN General Assembly meeting on the International Court of Justice –
the UN’s primary judicial branch – the “China stands for proper settlement
through negotiations, dialogue and consultation.”and this moved, the China
advantage for diplomacy and friendly negotiations. I think so, very timely and
wise moved strategist by Chinese regime.
Xu added and said, the means of
disputes should be based on ‘sovereignty equality and in full respect for the
wish of the states concerned.” It’s look like a soft stance by the Chinese
government un-rhetoric, un-assertive and foreseen of diplomatic approaches to
resolve maritime claims in peaceful respects and strategist.
China, the Philippines, and four
other nations have overlapping claims across the vast South China Sea and West
Philippine Sea. Geologist experts, some disputed areas are to believe to sit
atop of vast multi-trillions US$ undersea deposits of oil and gas and straddle
some of the world’s busiest sea lane. Maritime study say in data that “40% of
the International trade sea lane route go passed by this area.” That’s why this
maritime claim is so important to global trade transshipment route for the
International cargo vessels of transferring good and products to any world of
destination would means of everybody concerned from the International
Community.
Alarmed from the neighboring
countries affected by this maritime disputes, the massive land reclamation by
China over the past18 months in the South China Sea has rattled countries in
the region and caused concern United States, which support the freedom of
navigations in the international water under the provisions of UNCLOS both
Chinese government and Philippines signed and submitted deposited the
instruments to UNCLOS and binding in the UNCLOS Charter Laws.
Last week, a US Navy destroyer,
the USS Larssen, challenge China’s claim to a 12-miles (19-kilometers)
territorial limit around Subi Reef in the Spratly Islands. US motives it shows
remain the World’s police power to protect and secure world community in time
of crisis like what happened in South China Sea.
While the permanent Court of
Arbitration has taken up the Philippines dispute with China, there have not
been any cases yet at the International Court of Justice or ICJ, whose main
function is to settle legal disputes submitted by countries. So, my
multi-trillions US$ question, what to be the legal litigation in ICJ of still
non-Arbitration case has been filed yet in the Court???
Last words from China to UN
International Court of Justice or ICJ,”Xu said, is consistently committed to
settling disputes through friendly consultations and will as always support the
ICJ in fulfilling its mandate,” he said. Meaning they conformed for diplomatic
engagement and peaceful settlement with this on-going maritime claims.
And yet, China has not made a
categorical statement recognizing the ICJ’s jurisdiction on particular
Arbitration case filed by the Philippines government.
Hypothetically, however, another
state could bring a case to the court, based on a treaty to which China is
party and which says that disputes can be refilled again to the ICJ. Source:
United Nation (AP)and Incorporated comments from the owner of this Blog Site.
Take Note: Donation and Paid Online Blog, Infographic, Infomercial,
Events, Talent Fee (TF) and Ad, please pay to the Bank
Accounts @ Any branches listed below in the Philippines: Accounts
Name: ABDULJAMAN A.
DAMAHAN/ABSDAMAHAN’SLIVE – STREAM NEWS TV (ADLSNTV) and
adlsntv.blogspot.com Business
Permit No. 007489-0 – GSC and DTI Certificate No. 03233061, BIR-OCN
2RC0000905639, Philippine Government Electronics Procurement (PhilGEPS)
Accredited and Registered Blogger/TV Streaming and paid broadcast @ Radyo
ALERTO AM Station 1107 KHz (ALERTOHANAY SA BARANGAY) Aired every Saturday from:
3:00PM – 4:00PM Email: absdamahanslive@gmail.com TM: 0926-866-7003 Smart:
0947-484-2808 Bank Accounts: For Local
Payments: UNIONBANK VISA Account No. 109452727900 Local: PS Bank MasterCard
Account No.198-391-00087-6, Paypal Account @ mindevglobalfoodlines@gmail.com,
GCASH Account: 0905-211-1991 and/or For International Payments: Payoneer
Prepaid MasterCard Account No. xxxx-6041 must Confirm to Email Add:
mindanaoconsultant@gmail.com Blog Site: adlsntv.blogspot.com Legal consultant:
Atty. Eden Rachel M. Gencianos
Note: This Blog to be continued and Audio Interview will be aired in
our Radio Talk Show programs
Radyo ALERTO – GENSAN

No comments:
Post a Comment